The prototype showed promise right out of the gate. “From turning on Snowflake, Coalesce, and Fivetran to having the first star schema took just seven hours—of which five hours was spent trying to find the right data in NetSuite,” recalls Tantrum.
In the beginning, Tischler didn’t know everything he was going to need, so he and Tantrum approached it subject area by subject area, the first being sales. They got started with a project reporting on Fourth of July weekend sales, got a quick first win, and moved on to the next area where they could have a positive impact. “It’s better to have those quick wins and keep things very modular than to say, ‘We’re going to spend three years in a cave and kind of have a big bang at the end,’” says Tischler. “You need to show value along the way. Most projects are multi-year, but as I worked with the Resultant team it was more like multi-week.”
Even though he was not a technical data engineer himself—just a CFO who understood data—Tischler was soon able to take over the project and do everything himself. It took him just 300 hours to build out the full production data warehouse he needed, including the Tableau dashboards. “The total cost for the entire build out was less than the other guys quoted me just to build the first module,” he says.
By starting with this low-risk, low-cost approach, Tischler was able to help ease any anxiety the company’s leadership team might have had in investing in a new solution. He recalls one experienced board member warning him, “I’ve done this wrong in the past and it cost me two to three years, so I just want to make sure that you’re doing it properly.” Tantrum concurs, adding that “If you get it wrong, data warehouse projects can be the iceberg on which CIO careers die.” His best advice for mitigating risk? “Prototype, iterate, fail fast.”
Before the new data stack was in place, Tischler found that questions about business metrics he was asked in board meetings could take him up to a week to answer; today, he’s able to respond to these types of questions immediately with accurate, real-time data. “At the end of the day, I needed this thing to be useful,” he says. “We had a lot of questions people in the business—including myself—were asking, and we needed a very structured result very quickly.”
“Now the board can get numbers at the pace they need them in order to measure and manage the business,” says Tantrum. “All for a small investment of 300 hours, some software, and a bit of Snowflake compute—as opposed to loading ongoing overhead onto the IT team, employing more staff, and building more infrastructure.”
In the end, Tischler appreciated not just the flexibility of the solution Resultant helped him put in place, but also the nature of their working relationship itself. “It’s important to have the right partner who understands the iterative nature [of this kind of project], and who’s not going to get annoyed with my never-ending requests for changes because I didn’t get the requirements right the first time,” he says. “I think the more flexible you can be in every situation, the better.”
As for what the future holds for RuffleButts, the company plans to continue expanding its offerings beyond children’s clothing into adult apparel. And the robust, new solution in place will allow the company to add more data, more subject areas, and more analyses for wider business questions, and to do all that in a highly time-efficient and cost-efficient manner, saving the company money—something that any CFO would smile about.